Recently, the poetic community has witnessed a concerning surge in serial plagiarism. Our beautiful art, built on the foundation of creativity, originality, and self-expression, is under threat from those who would copy and paste the words of others without remorse. It is time for us, as poets and lovers of poetry, to stand united against this insidious practice.
While some big platforms exist to celebrate and promote poetry, they have not been doing enough to combat plagiarism effectively. We, the poets, recognize that preserving the integrity of our craft is our responsibility. It's time to take matters into our own hands.
This thread marks the beginning of a crucial movement - a gathering of like-minded individuals determined to protect the soul of poetry. We invite you to join us in brainstorming strategies, sharing experiences, and nurturing a community dedicated to upholding the principles of originality and creativity in our beloved art form.
Together, we will establish guidelines, develop tools, and raise awareness about the importance of crediting the source and respecting intellectual property in poetry. But we won't stop there. In our commitment to transparency and accountability, we will also feature a "Top of the Pops" section, where we will identify and name those who have committed egregious acts of plagiarism in the poetic world. It's time to hold the offenders accountable and protect the true poets who pour their hearts into their work.
Let this thread be the catalyst for change, a platform where we join forces to combat plagiarism and reaffirm our dedication to the beauty of authentic, original verse. Together, we can ensure that the poetic community remains a sanctuary for creativity, innovation, and respect for one another's words. Join us, and let's write a brighter future for poetry, free from the shadows of plagiarism.
There has been a win by somebody. I searched A. G on Amazon a week ago and the blurb how she was an exciting new poet came up. Today I searched Amazon.Australia, booktopia, fish pond and dymocks online; only Dymocks had 3 titles but at AUD $41.00 each I don't think they will sell many. That escapade was not a single young person, rather it was a site on a platform that was hacked and then used by a group to rip off poets. Why do I say that 1 a young person wants fame or infamy not anonymity, 2 there was too many being ripped of for it to be a single individual , or one that could afford the algorithm that scanned for the poems. But leaves the problem of how to protect micro poems